Nairobi Women Representative Esther Passaris’ proposal to cordon off protests to designated zones has continued to generate heat from different political players and other stakeholders.

In a lengthy statement on Saturday night, July 5, 2025, Passaris came out to further defend her proposed bill seeking to prohibit public gatherings from Parliament and other protected areas.

The lawmaker elected under the Orange Democratic Movement (ODM) insisted that her bill does not seek to silence protests but rather organise them.

Her proposed Public Order (Amendment) Bill, 2025, also seeks to demarcate areas of assembly and protest zones to prevent the destruction of property.

Passaris, in her statement, indicated that she wants to prevent chaos and not to criminalise picketing as purported by some political quarters.

“My amendment does not seek to silence protest it seeks to organise it. It does not criminalise dissent; it provides boundaries to prevent chaos, injury, or the kind of tragic losses we continue to witness,” Passaris argued.

“The bill focuses on proximity to protected areas, not the content or purpose of any demonstration. It proposes that picketing near Parliament, Courts, and other vital state installations happen at a safe, coordinated distance. This mirrors global norms not suppression, but structure,” she added.

Calls for dialogue

With the bill raising uproar, Passaris made it clear that she is open to dialogue. She challenged those with differing opinions to converge to discussions to find a solution to the issue.

Further, Passaris clarified that the proposed bill is open to more amendments.

“Let’s have the national dialogue we all crave: one where rights are upheld and responsibilities are clear. I remain open to refinement and engagement with civil society, legal minds, and fellow legislators.”

Her proposed bill also grants the Interior Cabinet Secretary and county governments the authority to designate demonstration zones.

On Friday, July 3, 2025, she defended the move by criticising those accusing her of undermining rights, insisting her focus is on safety and constitutional order.

“I am not here to take away rights. I am here to protect Kenyans and ensure we have order when people exercise their freedoms,” she explained.