Education: Change to CBE little more than cosmetic facelift
By David Kipkorir, May 16, 2025The recent announcement to transition from Kenya’s Competency-Based Curriculum (CBC) to Competency-Based Education (CBE) has been heralded by some as a bold step toward educational reform.
Government officials and education stakeholders have touted this shift as a response to the challenges faced by CBC since its rollout in 2017. Yet, beneath the glossy rhetoric and rebranding, the truth is stark: this change is little more than a cosmetic facelift.
The core issues plaguing Kenya’s education system – underfunding, teacher shortages, infrastructure deficits, and inequity – remain unaddressed. The move from CBC to CBE is not a solution; it’s a distraction, and nothing substantial will change.
Let’s start with the obvious: the name change itself is a master class in bureaucratic sleight of hand. CBC, introduced to replace the exam-centric 8-4-4 system, promised to prioritise skills, creativity, and critical thinking over rote memorisation.
It was sold as a transformative framework that would prepare Kenyan children for a dynamic, 21st century world. Eight years later, the system is riddled with complaints – overburdened teachers, confused parents, inadequate resources, and an assessment system that feels like a rehashed version of the old exams it sought to replace.
Now, the Ministry of Education claims CBE will address these shortcomings. But what is CBE if not CBC with a new acronym? The core principles – competency-focused learning, student-centered approaches, and practical skills – remain identical. The shift in terminology is a hollow gesture, akin to repainting a crumbling house and calling it a renovation.
Proponents of CBE argue it will streamline implementation and address stakeholder concerns. Yet, the government has provided no clear blueprint detailing how CBE differs from CBC in practice.
The same curriculum frameworks, learning areas, and competency goals appear to be carried over with minor tweaks. If the problem with CBC was poor execution – teachers untrained in its methodologies, schools lacking basic materials like textbooks and desks, and parents struggling to afford project-based learning costs – how does rebranding it as CBE fix anything?
The answer is simple: it doesn’t. The structural deficiencies that crippled CBC will persist under CBE because officials have shown no commitment to tackling them head-on.
Take teacher training, for instance. CBC’s success hinged on educators equipped to deliver a radically different pedagogy. Yet, many teachers were thrown into the deep end with minimal professional development.
Reports indicate that only a fraction of the 229,000 primary school teachers received adequate CBC training by 2023. Under CBE, there’s no evidence of a robust plan to retrain these educators or recruit more to address the teacher-student ratio, which in some regions exceeds 1:60.
Without well-prepared teachers, CBE will be just as ineffective as its predecessor, no matter how many times the government claims it’s “refined” the system.
Then there’s the issue of resources – or the lack thereof. CBC required schools to provide materials for hands-on learning, from art supplies to science kits. Many schools, especially in rural and marginalised areas, couldn’t comply.
Classrooms remain overcrowded, with some students sitting on the floor. The digital literacy component of CBC, which aimed to integrate technology, was a pipe dream for schools without electricity, let alone computers.
Has the government outlined a budget to equip schools for CBE’s demands? No. The 2025 education budget allocates a paltry 2.5 percent increase to basic education, far below the 6 percent GDP recommended by UNESCO. Without addressing these material shortages, CBE will inherit CBC’s failures, repackaged under a shinier name.
The writer is a Communication Consultant